New role
for old powerlines
By Lia Timson
December 9, 2003
It
has been hailed as the solution to the digital divide and the ultimate
in in-home networking, but powerline communications technology (PLC)
has not yet captivated Australia, despite commercial roll-outs in Europe
and dozens of trials in North and South America.
A
new report is urging the Federal Government to encourage its advancement.
PLC,
also known as broadband powerline (BPL), allows voice and data to be
transmitted using overhead and underground electricity cables.
The
technology is not new. Power companies have transmitted signals between
electricity towers, albeit in narrow band, for decades, and some even
use it to remotely read customer meters and control off-peak hot-water
systems. But only recently has it advanced enough to minimise noise
interference and allow hardware vendors to fine-tune their offerings.
The concept is simple and attractive: high-speed data is carried to
and from the internet on electrical cables and delivered to users anywhere
there is a power point.
Energy
companies like it because it realises further potential in their existing
and pervasive infrastructure assets; internet service providers want
it because they may be able to buy capacity from suppliers other than
Telstra; and consumers, especially those in remote areas, stand to gain
better access to services and pricing.
As
concluded by people attending a recent industry roundtable in Sydney
organised by telecommunications analyst Paul Budde, PLC is now a reality
and the technology usable. So why hasn't it happened yet?
Juergen
Bender, chief executive of German-based PLC consultancy Bender Information
& Systemtechnology, prepared the report for the Government. He says
Australia is falling behind the rest of the world.
"If
Australia is not very active early next year, it will miss the opportunity
because it will give Telstra more time to renew their network and grab
more customers, making it harder for others to challenge them,"
he says.
Bender
stops short of accusing the Government of stalling the advancement of
PLC until the remaining sale of Telstra, but says an alternative broadband
roll-out, particularly in rural areas, would have a substantial impact
on the telco.
PLC
has also encountered considerable resistance from regulators, with the
Australian Communications Authority publishing a damning report on its
viability just days after its representatives attended the Budde roundtable.
The
ACA's main reservations stemmed from the level of noise "radiation"
produced by high volumes of data transmission over the cables, and the
possible interference with other traditional system users, such as amateur
radio operators.
The
ACA has since apologised for not fully disclosing its concerns at the
forum and reassured participants it has not made any decisions regarding
PLC. But regulators are not the only ones lukewarm about the possibilities.
Andrew
Chetham, principal analyst with Gartner, is pessimistic.
"The
biggest problem is handling the backhaul traffic from the transformers
- that is from 240 volts - to higher voltage in the grid," he says.
"The
alternative would be to link the transformers to existing telco links
(to take it across to other low-voltage segments), but that destroys
the business model," Chetham says. "It doesn't look that promising."
Regulators
are concerned about lack of standards, plus privacy, security and service
quality, given the possible unstable nature of the power supply. But
Bender says these can also be solved.
In
summarising his report to the roundtable, Bender said the Australian
grid had been inspected and proved suitable to provide PLC, adding:
"Now narrowband and broadband PLC projects must be launched."
He
wants the Government to lead the way by conducting a trial on the Northern
Territory power grid and to work with the ACA to deregulate the industry
and develop standards.
"National
standards have to be developed to ensure co-existence (of power utilities)
and backbone interconnection is likely to be a major challenge (but)
the data collected in the trial should enable utilities to build viable
business cases."
Paul
Budde says PLC is a reality but players need to be more sophisticated
in their approach. Geoff Fietz, manager telecommunication enterprises,
Country Energy, agrees. He has overseen research into PLC since 2001.
"We
have been exploring two vendors' equipment - one Australian and the
other from overseas - for 18 months or so," Fietz says.
Country
Energy - born from the amalgamation of Great Southern Energy, Advance
Power and NorthPower - covers 72 per cent of NSW.
It
has two uses for PLC: the ability to offer new broadband internet to
rural communities and the promise of remotely monitoring its own power
grid.
It
will conduct a trial in Armidale with Transgrid, the University of New
England and the New England Smart Community Action Project in 2004.
Eventually it may sell excess broadband capacity to others wanting to
tap into its 180,000 kilometres of cables.
This story was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/12/08/1070732152234.html